Re: trick the query optimiser to skip some optimisations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Дмитрий Шалашов
Subject Re: trick the query optimiser to skip some optimisations
Date
Msg-id CAKPeCUFxPfAtYKJk1sVh_Upe3YYH-kyd4f_fpZ_PnNyvXa0+NA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: trick the query optimiser to skip some optimisations  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: trick the query optimiser to skip some optimisations
List pgsql-performance
Thanks for the tip!

Well, index is now used but...

 Limit  (cost=264291.67..264291.75 rows=31 width=50)
   ->  Sort  (cost=264291.67..264292.80 rows=453 width=50)
         Sort Key: added
         ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on feed  (cost=1850.99..264278.18 rows=453 width=50)
               Recheck Cond: ((active_id = user_id) AND (type = 1))
               Filter: ((user_id + 0) = 7)
               ->  Bitmap Index Scan on feed_user_id_added_idx2  (cost=0.00..1850.88 rows=90631 width=0)


Best regards,
Dmitriy Shalashov


2014-01-30 Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Дмитрий Шалашов <skaurus@gmail.com> wrote:
 
"feed_user_id_added_idx2" btree (user_id, added DESC) WHERE active_id = user_id AND type = 1

 ...
 
SELECT * FROM feed WHERE user_id = ? AND type = 1 AND active_id = user_id ORDER BY added DESC LIMIT 31;

But it doesn't use the last index. EXPLAIN shows this:

 Limit  (cost=0.00..463.18 rows=31 width=50)
   ->  Index Scan Backward using feed_user_id_active_id_added_idx on user_feed  (cost=0.00..851.66 rows=57 width=50)
         Index Cond: ((user_id = 7) AND (active_id = 7))
         Filter: (type = 1)

So as we can see optimiser changes "active_id = user_id" to "active_id = <whatever value user_id takes>". And it brokes my nice fast partial index :(
Can I do something here so optimiser would use the feed_user_id_added_idx2 index? It's around ten times smaller than the 'generic' feed_user_id_active_id_added_idx index.

How about "where user_id+0=?" 

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: trick the query optimiser to skip some optimisations
Next
From: jugnooken
Date:
Subject: Re: WHERE with ORDER not using the best index