Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Sumeet Jauhar
Subject Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption
Date
Msg-id CAKN1Xtp-Qu3vXkX29iu549NkG4bAgxXCyztS61-LVFGDsmV-Wg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Thank you . Scott and Brad . Valuable information for sure . I plan to
browse through the documentation for Postgres 9 and identify all the
potential advantages that it will bring to our application . As
rightly pointed out 8.2 may be on the path to obsolescence .

On Friday, August 5, 2011, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
>> then you should really do so.  The changes to things like autovacuum
>> getting multi-threaded (8.3) HOT updates (8.3) on disk tracking of
>
> Wait, multithreaded autovac may have been put in place in 8.2 .
> Anyway, my points still stand, just might be off a version here or
> there.
>
>
> --
> To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Sumeet Jauhar
Date:
Subject: Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption
Next
From: "mark"
Date:
Subject: XFS options and benchmark woes