Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_pq_ric3G3fNBNXNR+eD_rv=xmYwNkYOxAy+CZ2Zy-Bg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 10 May 2018 at 14:01, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking something a bit more radical.  First, since partition
> pruning is the future and constraint exclusion is soon to be a thing of
> the past, we should describe pruning first, and then describe exclusion
> in terms of pruning.

But... that's not true.  The chapter describes inheritance partitioned
tables too, and we're not getting rid of constraint exclusion because
it's needed for those. However, that might not mean your patch has to
be changed. I'd better have a look...

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?