Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_pPaABFfwr2pVF44ZP7pnLyGz9ZTPoTUXVUpO6J3+iYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward fasterpartition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12 January 2018 at 22:51, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/01/12 18:09, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 10 January 2018 at 17:18, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Basically, the changes to add_paths_to_append_rel() are causing
>>> duplication in partition_rels.
>
>> I also noticed earlier that this is still broken in v19.
>
> I cannot see the duplication here (with v19 + some local changes per your
> latest review, although I had fixed the issue in v18).

I may have made a mistake there. The code I expected to change didn't.
I meant to test the case again, but I got distracted just before I did
and came back a while later and forgot that I hadn't tested.

If you've tested my case and it works, then please don't look any
further. I will look when v20 is ready.

Sorry for the false alarm... I must've been trying to do too many
things at once :-(

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key