Re: Cleaning up and speeding up string functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Cleaning up and speeding up string functions
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_eVctth7XnBPg10PgwDohk2sSokQRSe-2e7PaRb35rjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleaning up and speeding up string functions  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Cleaning up and speeding up string functions  (ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker))
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 13:51, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Instead of having 0004, how about the attached?
>
> Most of the calls won't improve much performance-wise since they're so
> cheap anyway, but there is xmlconcat(), I imagine that should see some
> speedup.

I've pushed this after having found a couple more places where the
length is known.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: make libpq documentation navigable between functions
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb