On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 03:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > The reason I thought it was a good idea to track some history there
> > was to stop the lock table constantly being shrunk back to the default
> > size every time a simple single table query was executed.
>
> I think that's probably gilding the lily, considering that this whole
> issue is pretty new. There's no evidence that expanding the local
> lock table is a significant drag on queries that need a lot of locks.
Okay. Here's another version with all the average locks code removed
that only recreates the table when it's completely empty.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
