Re: Memory Accounting v11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Memory Accounting v11
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_YnwRSCdbYkpQxX1bk4zu2_297rCFt66z2uqe7_GooqA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory Accounting v11  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Memory Accounting v11  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 16 July 2015 at 05:07, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 12:59 +0530, Atri Sharma wrote:

>
> I think a heuristic would be more suited here and ignoring memory
> consumption for internal types means that we are not making the memory
> accounting useful for a set of usecases.
>
OK, I will drop this patch and proceed with the HashAgg patch, with a
heuristic for internal types.


Should we mark the patch as "returned with feedback" in the commitfest app then?
 
--
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory prefetching while sequentially fetching from SortTuple array, tuplestore
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c