Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9L86y2wN_rTVKi2PM5S0Mnq_wAYS1YVu6R3ymupHObbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 26 October 2018 at 16:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I recall Ronan Dunklau and Julien Rouhaud had proposed a patch for this
> last year, but the partitioning-related planning code hadn't advanced then
> as much as it has today, so they sort of postponed working on it.
> Eventually their patch was returned with feedback last November.  Here's
> the link to their email in case you wanted to read some comments their
> proposal and patch got, although some of them might be obsolete.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2401607.SfZhPQhbS4%40ronan_laptop

Thanks. I wasn't aware, or ... forgot. Looks like back then was tricky
times to be doing this. Hopefully, the dust has settled a little bit
now.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards