Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9J9H0TFV+7sf1hDZJ3CqmY9t515rWzsgO12c4Y_Aza+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 17:58, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> +      Whether using table inheritance or native partitioning, hierarchies
>
> Maybe, it would better to use the word "declarative" instead of "native",
> if only to be consistent; neighboring paragraphs use "declarative".

Thanks for having a look.

I've attached the pg10 and pg11 patches with that updated... and also
the master one (unchanged) with the hopes that the CF bot picks that
one.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Read-only access to temp tables for 2PC transactions
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning