Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9BLz4uxbp2qS_pVA2R5ggYHL3Z7GLVHp15x30K81iW2w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6 July 2018 at 09:41, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Committed.
>
> Thanks for handling this.
>
> Should we do this in REL_11_STABLE too?  I vote yes.

Sorry for now paying much attention to this, but I've read through
what's been committed and I also think PG11 deserves this too.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing