On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 16:09, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> FWIW, it makes me a bit uneasy to change this function signature in
> back-branches if that's the intention as I suspect that it gets used
> in extensions.. For HEAD that's fine of course.
I wondered about this too and questioned Tom about it above. There
was no response.
I just assumed Tom didn't think it was worth fiddling with in back-branches.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services