Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8ivT-=UdnsPxFq+hTi4QrspdCdtBZ8T7LtBUPJHv_uEw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at this.

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 03:03, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> As for the latest version (v8-0001-...) I've only caught a small typo: "When
> the first subpath needs sorted ...". It was probably meant "... needs sort
> ...".

That was a sort of short way of saying "needs [to be] sorted". I've
added in the missing "to be" in the attached.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shawn Debnath
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: psql display of foreign keys