Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8h8283Vb2NcQH+YOMErdDQZWGuqGoe-gX6yT8TKGf0MA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3 July 2018 at 18:11, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:00:46PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> I think it should be backpatched to v11 and v10. Your original commit
>> went there too. I don't see any reason to do any different here than
>> what you did with the original commit.
>
> expand_partitioned_rtentry is new as of v11.  Or you mean to tweak
> expand_inherited_rtentry() perhaps?  I am not sure that it is worth it
> as the code has already diverged between 10 and 11.

Oh right. I'd forgotten that changed in v11. I think the v10 code is
fine as is then.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees
Next
From: Arseny Sher
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible bug in logical replication.