Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8_3ACVJ6ioQFmxes_rHdChcivKa4cEy_cd-229MZ9=Gg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 00:51, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Just so I don't forget about this, I've added it to the July 'fest.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2065/

Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into
master should be more like the attached.

I think the original patch is fine for the back branches.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Iwata, Aya"
Date:
Subject: RE: Contribution to Perldoc for TestLib module in Postgres
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Qestion about .partial WAL file