Re: [HACKERS] Making clausesel.c Smarter - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Making clausesel.c Smarter
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8YiZ_KaXtW-35Yk704qSugJvZp3Kfmoz4+T9n+nL91EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Making clausesel.c Smarter  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Making clausesel.c Smarter  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8 April 2017 at 09:33, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> Otherwise, the patch LGTM, but I'd like to solve the quadratic
> behavior too... are you going to try? Otherwise I could take a stab at
> it myself. It doesn't seem very difficult.

I have some ideas in my head in a fairly generic way of solving this
which I'd like to take care of in PG11.

Many thanks for your reviews and suggestions on this patch, it's much
appreciated.

-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present