Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to parallel query docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to parallel query docs
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f88-M6ZcrK5A+vW1gqrGhQYv=WUacAss20KkRE8gZ2hag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to parallel query docs  (Brad DeJong <Brad.Dejong@infor.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to parallel query docs  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14 February 2017 at 10:56, Brad DeJong <Brad.Dejong@infor.com> wrote:
> David Rowley wrote:
>> I propose we just remove the whole paragraph, and mention about
>> the planning and estimated number of groups stuff in another new paragraph.
>>
>> I've attached a patch to this effect ...
>
> s/In a worse case scenario/In the worst case scenario,/
>
> Other than that, the phrasing in the new patch reads very smoothly.

Thanks. Updated patch attached.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove all references to "xlog"from SQL-callable functions in p
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash