Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Rowley
Subject Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f82-6mj+iWD2AhLoHHikp0EwhiZwa5W7xmPBn052H91BQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 18:53, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have looked at the patch.  It seems right to make
> match_boolean_partition_clause() return PartClauseMatchStatus instead
> of bool.  Didn't find anything to complain about.

Thanks for having a look. I've just pushed roughly that patch with
just some additional comments.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15905: FATAL: the database system is starting up
Next
From: Lakradi Marwan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15904: ERROR: argument of LIMIT must not contain variables