On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 00:18, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> I admittedly haven't followed this thread too closely, but if having 100
> partitions causes out of memory on pg11, that sounds like a massive
> regression to me.
For it to have regressed it would have had to once have been better,
but where was that mentioned? The only thing I saw was
non-partitioned tables compared to partitioned tables, but you can't
really say it's a regression if you're comparing apples to oranges.
I think the only regression here is in the documents from bebc46931a1
having removed the warning about too many partitions in a partitioned
table at the end of ddl.sgml. As Amit mentions, we'd like to put
something back about that.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services