Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Rowley
Subject Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f-N9NC7K41fRwgRyHEUiBbOLB_Lmhsfu8AnHt2=ZkqBoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop functionoperation" on DB with functions having same name  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 09:20, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:04 PM David Rowley
> <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I think since the original argument was a bool then it's pretty
> > unlikely that such an assert would ever catch anything, given 0 and 1
> > are both valid values for this enum type.
>
> Indeed.  It looks all fine to me in v6, so I'm marking the patch as
> ready for committer.

Great. Thanks for reviewing it.


-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15643: Problem using PGAdmin 4.2 to connect to postrgres hot standby
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15643: Problem using PGAdmin 4.2 to connect to postrgres hot standby