Re: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbzX+KiHgyCS=8DpVgaTu1H9hjOTO7THK=cH=+vxnuzYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum  (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum
List pgsql-admin
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 6:58 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm not wedded to the name RECREATE TABLE, but am wedded to the fact that VACUUM FULL is a horrible name for what it does.


I think there is general agreement here but your cure is arguably worse than the disease.

A more realistic option would be to at least put "VACUUM FULL" into its own section of the documentation instead of having FULL be an optional modifier to the normal VACUUM command.

Are there other spots in the documentation that misrepresent the situation to our readers?

David J.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for feature: VACUUM FULL updates pg_stat_all_tables.last_vacuum