Re: [GENERAL] Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs notalways identical - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs notalways identical
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbwTn81+WhGW=n-XOjftKkOy6hVOiDG9K44dJJCijysvA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs notalways identical  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:10 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
But IIUC the system seems designed around master->slave replication and doesn't support slave daisy-chains.


​I thought that sounded wrong when I wrote it...


David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sasa Vilic
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs notalways identical
Next
From: Sasa Vilic
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Shared WAL archive between master and standby: WALs notalways identical