Re: Limitation in `pg_lsclusters` and `pg_dropcluster --stop` on Debian-based Systems - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Limitation in `pg_lsclusters` and `pg_dropcluster --stop` on Debian-based Systems
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbsvvC+vhGXB5mGYw-5F29W2B9wKGm8DYtxFW2oboDoOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Limitation in `pg_lsclusters` and `pg_dropcluster --stop` on Debian-based Systems
List pgsql-bugs
On Monday, February 17, 2025, AKASH <akashbhujbal7051@gmail.com> wrote:
Package:`postgresql-common`  
Version:17  
Severity:Wishlist  
Reported by:Akash
Date:18/02/2025


This isn’t a good place to publish such a wishlist since these tools are not written by the core project developers for whom this list exists.

That said, neither 1 nor 2 seems all that likely to happen - either use the tooling provided, and its conventions, or don’t.

The confirmation prompt for 3 I could see happening but it really isn’t how Linux tooling is done generally, so I wouldn’t hold my breath.  Especially if you need someone to write the patch, not just approve it.

David J.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18806: When enable_rartitionwise_join is set to ON, the database shuts down abnormally
Next
From: AKASH
Date:
Subject: Re: Limitation in `pg_lsclusters` and `pg_dropcluster --stop` on Debian-based Systems