Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbskfHHY2xgLeyzXXu7QqvH=LT5OPEe2YSG79P=yti+Aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-committer reviews: is it helpful?  (Alexander Borisov <lex.borisov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 4:08 PM Alexander Borisov <lex.borisov@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, I'm not asking anything of others, I didn't quite understand your
point (sorry, English is not my native language). With my patches, I
proposed significant improvements for Postgres.

 
When you propose a patch to be committed you are asking, at minimum, a reviewer to review that patch and a committer to commit it once reviewed.  That is how the process works.

Reviews, though, are always useful.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: split tablecmds.c
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX support