Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwba8iE+vp3EqXXihtNASomo9b-MnUjHHrG5R95sqQ2qGw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
and have other error
information in pg_stat_subscription_workers view.

What benefit is there to keeping the existing collector-based pg_stat_subscripiton_workers view?  If we re-write it using shmem IPC then we might as well put everything there and forego using a catalog.  Then it behaves in a similar manner to pg_stat_activity but for logical replication workers.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: support for CREATE MODULE
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: 2022-01 Commitfest