Re: text fields and performance for ETL - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: text fields and performance for ETL
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbX37AwNcKHMeaOq+LS_nhw_6sHwaUK1+UsQ8Nuo7bcfg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: text fields and performance for ETL  (Grega Jesih <Grega.Jesih@actual-it.si>)
Responses RE: text fields and performance for ETL
List pgsql-docs
On Thursday, November 4, 2021, Grega Jesih <Grega.Jesih@actual-it.si> wrote:


So why would it then be published ? Because inexperienced programmers take your statement that "it's the same performance" from a wrong perspective, so it would be fair to note, that the remark "it's the same performance" is meant "within any operation inside Postgres database". In the moment we want to take this data elsewhere,

the problematic lack of model design comes out. 

If you wish to supply an actual patch for consideration I’d review it.  Absent that the documentation serves the vast majority of readers well as-is.  We’re entitled to a bit of self-centeredness here, especially when the broader world is so varied.

David J.
 

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Grega Jesih
Date:
Subject: RE: text fields and performance for ETL
Next
From: Grega Jesih
Date:
Subject: RE: text fields and performance for ETL