Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwbJ5Aun37K8+ZtgP5AvjOXLbTX0CAkc4h6Vb8td85s6EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?  (Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thursday, February 10, 2022, Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 10, 2022, at 17:06 , Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> wrote:

But SQL is a terrible, no good, very bad language.


I cannot accept such a religious persecution of SQL without a detailed explanation.


I feel like anyone who is defending SQL here isn’t aware of how much better the alternatives are, and how bad SQL really is.



I’m very comfortable in my ignorance and apathy here…since even you feel resigned to use PostgreSQL presently.  When you find an alternative you will substitute for PostgreSQL let me know.  I don’t see that PostgreSQL is best served trying to make you happy on this front.

David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Guyren Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Next
From: Raymond Brinzer
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?