Re: "Keyed" sequence? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: "Keyed" sequence?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwanUCZYVHCk+gnoqnHHsm_4_z-O6EXVYdH6u=7y6uCo6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Keyed" sequence?  (Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>)
Responses Re: "Keyed" sequence?
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net> wrote:

>
> It'll kill your performance, but if aesthetics are that important to you...

They're not *that* important. I was just asking if there was a way to do this easily.

​While the performance argument might be true it is heavily dependent upon concurrency.  I'm doubting a PO system in the typical company has enough concurrency, and is sensitivity enough to small delays,​
 
​that giving up the benefit of sequential numbering would be a worthwhile trade-off.

David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Israel Brewster
Date:
Subject: Re: "Keyed" sequence?
Next
From: Israel Brewster
Date:
Subject: Re: "Keyed" sequence?