Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwaf-h7iRFXnTg_XNN6tgZ+TCU6oRPozvDsq6Je-z-t+QQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 1:30 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 03:19:25PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:

> My thinking was "ask once, bump the thread once after 2 or 3 weeks just
> in case it got lost in the noise (this is a busy list), and after that
> let the matter rest if there is no answer".

We don't normally ignore emails, so would not bother with a second
request.

And yet the squeaky wheel does seem to get the grease; and I know from personal experience that emails will go unresponded two for weeks, which to a reasonable submitter to this list, when many responses are indeed the same day, seems like an email that got overlooked.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve documentation regarding custom settings, placeholders, and the administrative functions