Re: Add missing period to HINT messages - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Add missing period to HINT messages
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwaLqZGubKbb0z-_-fE3UEd3T+ScF8DBJDwnfTaUkDNmDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add missing period to HINT messages  (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>)
Responses Re: Add missing period to HINT messages
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, April 13, 2026, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:


I don't have a strong opinion on it, but I think generally that clean
up patches (where we aren't fixing some kind of document mistake or
misleading information) generally just go into HEAD for the next
release, though if it easily applies cleanly to back branches and you
want to do it, it's probably ok to apply it backwards, but I wouldn't
spend any time on it if it didn't.

I was under the impression that on both user-facing behavior changes grounds, and translation grounds, back-patching changes to existing messages is not allowed absent a true factual bug.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add missing period to HINT messages