Re: BUG #19033: Inconsistency between prepared statement and normal statement when cast bit to integer - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: BUG #19033: Inconsistency between prepared statement and normal statement when cast bit to integer
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwaBAgHuJHVrf7YvDBTmMbJATn8=AeJcGUuML77o5ma0HQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #19033: Inconsistency between prepared statement and normal statement when cast bit to integer  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Wednesday, August 27, 2025, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      19033
Logged by:          Chi Zhang
Email address:      798604270@qq.com
PostgreSQL version: 18beta3
Operating system:   ubuntu 24.04 with docker
Description:       

Hi,

In the normal statement, casting a bit value to INT is allowed, but in a
prepared statement, it will trigger an error.

In the following test case, the first query will return 15, but the EXECUTE
statement will trigger an error: parameter $1 of type bit cannot be coerced
to the expected type integer

```
SELECT (B'1111')::INT;
 int4
------
   15
(1 row)

PREPARE prepare_query (unknown) AS SELECT $1::INT;
EXECUTE prepare_query(B'1111');
ERROR:  parameter $1 of type bit cannot be coerced to the expected type
integer
```

If I modify the unknown type to bit, then the query can execute successfully
and return 15.
```
PREPARE prepare_query (bit) AS SELECT $1::INT;
EXECUTE prepare_query(B'1111');
 int4
------
   15
(1 row)
```

This doesn’t feel like a bug, using “unknown” is likely to cause typing issue, but I’m not sure I can explains exactly why.

 
I also find if I first cast B'1111' to bit and then cast it to integer, it
will become 1. But the correct result should be 15.

```
SELECT ((B'1111')::bit)::INT;
 int4
------
    1
(1 row)
```

The documentation explicitly contradicts your claim here and explain why this is correct.

David J.

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19031: pg_trgm infinite loop on certain cases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19033: Inconsistency between prepared statement and normal statement when cast bit to integer