Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwa9JtoCBVc6CJb7NC5FqMeEAy_A8X4H8t6kVaw7fz9LTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:39 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:

I was also wondering (but have not yet done) if the content *outside*
the tables should be reordered to match the table 28.1/28.2 order.

Thoughts?


I would love to do away with the ToC listing of view names in 28.2 altogether.

Also, make it so each view ends up being its own separate page.

The name of the views in the table should then be the hyperlinks to those pages.

Basically the way Chapter 54.1 works.  Though the interplay between the top Chapter 54 and 54.1 is a bit repetitive.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/views.html

I wonder whether having the table be structured but the ToC be purely alphabetical would be considered a good idea...

The tables need hyperlinks regardless.  I wouldn't insist on changing the ordering to match the table, especially with the hyperlinks, but I also wouldn't reject it.  Figuring out how to make them one-per-page would be time better spent though.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Date:
Subject: Re: Meson add host_system to PG_VERSION_STR
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Using BRIN indexes for sorted output