Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G Johnston
Subject Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwa8KWqwmVAVQJV+y=dAucNeL70FH7DAMjvg31fc7D+P=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation  (pinker <pinker@onet.eu>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:24 AM, pinker [via PostgreSQL] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Ok, but in this particular case I don't see any caveats

​You mean other than the infinite recursion, right?​

and think that could be classic case for rule to be used.
If it is "almost never the correct solution" why rules still exists at all? 

​Backward compatibility, the "almost", and ​the fact that views use rules as an implementation mechanism.

David J.




View this message in context: Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: pinker
Date:
Subject: Re: infinite recursion detected in rules for relation
Next
From: Vick Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: What's a reasonable maximum number for table partitions?