> If you have suggestion on how to improve the new format, I'm sure we can > discuss that. It seems pretty clear to me that we're not going back to > the old format.
Improve it by going back to old format. Not sure why that is not open to discussion?
More usefully, the current format and content changes are not going to be "reverted" so "going back" is not really an option. If you want to propose a patch for moving forward to a new format that is similar to the old one while retaining the content changes that would be a possible way forward.