Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwa7dtfe_EUWRKd2m4Tq5+1dpkpJeS2-2GRLE_WbDutW4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
Responses Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 12:19 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sept 2025 at 19:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, if it were 18-only we'd need a powwow about whether to break
> release freeze.  But since it's been there since 17 and nobody
> noticed, I'm content to wait till after 18.0 to fix it.

People definitely noticed[1], but I agree that there's no reason to
rush this fix out before the 18 release.

Patch looks good, but obviously needs some tests.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMEv5_syU0ZopE-2Wr8A8QksqrCyYT2hW06Rgw4RSPdyJO-%3Dfw%40mail.gmail.com


I'm presuming this report is also about the same underlying issue.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJDiXghdFcZ8%3Dnh4G69te7iRr3Q0uFyXxb3ZdG09_GTNZXwH0g%40mail.gmail.com

It too has a patch included.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project