Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improving GUC prefix ownership for extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Improving GUC prefix ownership for extensions
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZtF27GpUKw92jKQQQrQ6hoX+uJLEM-sXx34g+uosWS_Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Improving GUC prefix ownership for extensions  (Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>)
Responses Re: Improving GUC prefix ownership for extensions
Re: Improving GUC prefix ownership for extensions
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Wednesday, February 11, 2026, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:

Thoughts, would this be a useful feature?

I’d go with leaving well enough alone.  How bad are the consequences of leaving this protection mechanism opt-in? Do we really want the grief of making it mandatory?

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Little cleanup: Move ProcStructLock to the ProcGlobal struct
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)