Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZTke7+HUn4YUGqu2+gAPi4Cy18TXMrg_Z5nADkxfPNMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation  (maweki@gmail.com)
Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:33 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I'm inclined to propose adding an example a little further down, as
per the attached draft patch.  This wouldn't help people who stop
reading after the section's first sentence, but we can't cover
everything in the first sentence.


Given the tutorial nature of this section I agree with the approach.

I did a read through of the patch and I like it; though I suggest changing "but non-NULL" to "while non-NULL".

Thanks!

David J.

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Federico
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
Next
From: maweki@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign Keys being able to reference same table not spelled out in documentation