Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZBEe9_8e3kOLpYxGdy4FJrO-7gBLnxwRGifNGnA+xS4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database  ("孤傲小二～阿沐" <2903807914@qq.com>)
Responses 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database  ("孤傲小二～阿沐" <2903807914@qq.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view
On Thursday, November 11, 2021, 孤傲小二～阿沐 <2903807914@qq.com> wrote:
Hello, I think what you said is right, it should be the problem. But I don't know what to do in the lexical analysis system of plpgsql to solve this problem.


“To match” means keep two copies identical, in this case manually.  Try grepping for the pre-change line you are modifying to see where its twin is.

David J.
 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "孤傲小二～阿沐"
Date:
Subject: 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database
Next
From: "孤傲小二～阿沐"
Date:
Subject: 回复： I added a √ operator, the sqrt function is still used internally, but now there is a problem, it affects the := and .. operators of the database