Re: Lack of possibility to specify CTAS TAM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Lack of possibility to specify CTAS TAM
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZ2B3tpX9r3fcbf=1BNn4fz9x2wZuvxhuVer9s=vq2cCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Lack of possibility to specify CTAS TAM  (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Lack of possibility to specify CTAS TAM
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday, July 31, 2024, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote:

The same storage specification feature can actually be supported for
CTAE (like CTAS but execute) and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW.


On a related note, the description here seems outdated.


CMV also has this syntax already; we don’t actually have CTAE presently, correct?

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Lack of possibility to specify CTAS TAM
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences