Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYrri_n5ONPer6Yy+VxhzPCADb77ewuOjGw6+z-mQc+aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql's \d versus included-index-column feature  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Thursday, July 19, 2018, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Given that the documentation refers to included columns as "non-key
> columns", it seems natural to me to name the \d output column "Key?" and
> use "yes/no" as the values.

WFM, anyone want to argue against?

Works for me as well.

David J. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "R, Siva"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in gin insert redo code path during re-compression of emptygin data leaf pages
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Give a better error message on invalidhostaddr option.