On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com> writes: > Would anyone be able to shed some light on why expression based indexes > can't be used for an index only scan? > I've found a few comments saying this is the case, and I've proven it is > the case in reality - but I can't seem to find the why.
Well, it would help if you posted a concrete example ... but there's at least one known limitation: the planner's rule for whether an index can be used for an index-only scan is that all variables needed by the query be available from the index. So if you have an index on f(x), it might be useful for a query that needs f(x), but you won't get an index-only scan for it because the planner fails to notice that the query has no references to bare "x" but just "f(x)". (This is something that could be fixed, but it's not clear how to do so without imposing considerable cost on queries that get no benefit because they have no interest in f(x).)
The recommended workaround at the moment is to create a two-column index on "f(x), x". The second index column has no great value in reality, but it lets the planner accept the index as usable for an IOS. As a small consolation prize, it might let you get an IOS on cases where you *do* need x as well.
Have we intentionally excluded creating a section under Chapter 11. Indexes covering the user-visible dynamics of IOS and what can be done - such as the advice just given - to cause the planner to choose one?
