Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYabFqVNv7DFX1TO+yXkOH4HCY7H-i-0uUuSHoKARSHsw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:49 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
What about patterns?  Switches like --table or
--extension are able to digest a psql-like pattern to decide which
objects to dump.

The extension object type does not seem to have gotten the --exclude-extension capability that it would need to conform to the general design exemplified by --table and hopefully extended out to the routine object types.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: logical replication empty transactions