Re: Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwY6VOoXViQL-W=mB4iz=kAFQdpVzbawY94YdU9zmpExfQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So this is just a verbatim statement of the algorithm, which is what
>> I was hoping to avoid :-(.  But maybe there's no simpler way.

> I got nothin'.

Yeah, me either.  So here's a proposed patch, fixing a couple other
things:


LGTM

David J.

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for further clarification on synchronous_commit
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection