Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i
Date
Msg-id CAKAnmmJgHvPooiXZ5vzvONMWjcazg+Z4VEPrHW_NVFmUvYAX2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Asking for OK for a nasty trick to resolve PG CVE-2025-1094 i  ("Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham@bmc.com>)
List pgsql-general
CVE-2025-1094 has a narrow blast radius. If you are not directly affected, I would focus your efforts on getting to 17. But the lack of an existing process to smoothly upgrade minor revisions is worrying and something that needs to get addressed as well.

Cheers,
Greg

--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bartosz Stalewski
Date:
Subject: Vacuum related question
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: Review my steps for rollback to restore point