Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom DalPozzo
Subject Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Date
Msg-id CAK77FCQg_mZjvsJr6s=-bdQtq2pXA7YoVYHsSPDkGHaAkAcW6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view
Hi, I had already read that doc but I can't  answer clearly to my
questions 2,4 and 5.

The answer would seem to depend on what you consider 'a consistency state position'. Is it possible to be more explicit about what you mean?

Hi, I meant a position such that, if you replay up to it, then the DB is in a consistent state (transactions done entirely or not a t all...).
But, as Alvaro wrote, any position is ok
Thank you very much
Pupillo


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom DalPozzo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Improve PostGIS performance with 62 million rows?