Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGcoYxGzQit7egv1vVWc4-h9mGiQKCimRagNOUOYxcjt+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
* Amit Kapila (amit.kapila16@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I definitely may missed judging the current state of the patch. Please feel
> >> free to update the actual status.
> >
> > That's definitely up to the authors and reviewers to double-check what
> > has been done and correct anything they think is not. And far as I can
> > see you have done an admirable work in keeping it on tracks, so huge
> > +1 from me.
>
> I also think Hari has done a good job in wrapping up this commitfest.
> However, we might want to consider sending one consolidated mail for
> the patches "moved to next CF" or "Returned with Feedback" or
> "Rejected" rather than sending independent mails.  That might save
> some traffic on the list.

Agreed.  The status change is noted in the CF app, it doesn't need to be
included in the thread.  Further, having the info about what happened to
each patch in one consolidated email would be a lot easier for people to
review than an email on every thread.

Thanks for your opinions. I will do the same in future.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Indirect indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Typmod associated with multi-row VALUES constructs