Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shveta malik
Subject Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date
Msg-id CAJpy0uDG203d9x_+B56XE-7qB9g7mR8PGP9VL+LrGz94PZZU3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:26 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:17 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We should not allow the invalid replication slot to be altered
> > > irrespective of the reason unless there is any benefit.
> >
> > Okay, then I think we need to change the existing behaviour of the
> > other invalidation causes which still allow alter-slot.
>
> +1. Perhaps, track it in a separate thread?

I think so. It does not come under the scope of this thread.

thanks
Shveta



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation