Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 9:55 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 1:31 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Ajin. Would you be able to share the timing of test (complete
> > file) as well with this change in testfile.
>
> There was a small typo in the file I shared. (fixed and updated)
>
> The times are:
>
> # +++ tap check in src/test/recovery +++
> [14:22:31] t/053_synchronized_standby_slots_quorum.pl .. ok     6453
> ms ( 0.01 usr  0.00 sys +  0.36 cusr  0.49 csys =  0.86 CPU)
> [14:22:37]
> All tests successful.
> Files=1, Tests=14,  6 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.36 cusr
>  0.49 csys =  0.87 CPU)
> Result: PASS
>

Okay, looks good. 6 secs is far better than previous case of 60-100 secs.

thanks
Shveta