On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 4:14 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:37 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:20 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1276,7 +1331,7 @@ wait_for_slot_activity(bool some_slot_updated)
> > >
> > > The function is too cute to be useful. The code should be part of
> > > ReplSlotSyncWorkerMain() just like other worker's main functions.
> > >
> >
> > I was thinking we can retain wait_for_slot_activity() as this can even
> > be invoked from API flow. See my comment# 2 in [1]
>
> We want the SQL callable function to finish as fast as possible, and
> make all the slots sync ready as fast as possible. So a shorter nap
> time makes sense. We don't want to increase it per iteration. But sync
> worker is a long running worker and can afford to wait longer. In fact
> it should wait longer so as not to load the primary and the standby.
> Given that the naptimes in both cases can not be controlled by the
> same logic, I think it's better not to use the same function.
Okay, makes sense.
thanks
Shveta