Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shveta malik
Subject Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance
Date
Msg-id CAJpy0uAcm0b6cTnUK0GcRfYM+6B5Sszoe6rum_eF4uwev+8S7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 4:14 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:37 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 2:20 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1276,7 +1331,7 @@ wait_for_slot_activity(bool some_slot_updated)
> > >
> > > The function is too cute to be useful. The code should be part of
> > > ReplSlotSyncWorkerMain() just like other worker's main functions.
> > >
> >
> > I was thinking we can retain wait_for_slot_activity() as this can even
> > be invoked from API flow. See my comment# 2 in [1]
>
> We want the SQL callable function to finish as fast as possible, and
> make all the slots sync ready as fast as possible. So a shorter nap
> time makes sense. We don't want to increase it per iteration. But sync
> worker is a long running worker and can afford to wait longer. In fact
> it should wait longer so as not to load the primary and the standby.
> Given that the naptimes in both cases can not be controlled by the
> same logic, I think it's better not to use the same function.

Okay, makes sense.

thanks
Shveta



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove traces of long in dynahash.c
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11)