Home > mailing lists

Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From	Gregg Jaskiewicz
Subject	Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names?
Date	February 2, 2012 06:23:19
Msg-id	CAJY59_jTJGBP6Fuyq=-3o-z45th-vbadiALZc=6LdDOr3Ym3OQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names? (Bobby Dewitt <Bdewitt@appriss.com>)
List	pgsql-general

Tree view

Its because of pg_upgrade, 'in place' upgrade capabilities that are in
pg since 8.4. For that to work you need both old and new (current) set
of postgresql binaries. Etc.

pgsql-general by date:

From: Raghavendra
Date: 02 February 2012, 06:01:57
Subject: Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue

From: Venkat Balaji
Date: 02 February 2012, 06:51:13
Subject: Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue

Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names? - Mailing list pgsql-general

Previous

Next