Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.
Date
Msg-id CAJW2+qfNxgwaYbK9EZL2p6r_bXmp996jga=UWWCUmBT7yq4jdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:22, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It's hard to justify making a change that will produce less accurate results
> in the vast majority of cases, just to improve behavior in a situation where
> useless results are coming out no matter what.

When I added -T option, I only expected standard pgbench transactions.
Since they are short enough, the difference should not be large.

If you have a plan to execute custom queries that take 1 second
or more, a hard cut-off makes senses.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench -T isn't a hard cutoff.
Next
From: Alexey Klyukin
Date:
Subject: the '::' cast doesn't work in the FROM clause